Fellowship 2021Kwame Karikari FellowshipResearch

Comprehensive report on information disorder in the 2020 Ghana elections


Information is a major defining product or factor voters use in making decisions  during elections. However, the rise of technology and the ability to rapidly share  information through several mediums and platforms has propelled the issue of  information disorder commonly referred to as ‘fake news’ to the forefront of global  discussions.  

Information disorder is generally seen as any form of misinformation or  disinformation. Most scholars define misinformation as the unintentional sharing  of false information with no intention to cause harm whereas disinformation  constitutes the deliberate sharing of false information with the intention to cause  harm (Karlova & Fisher, 2012; Wardle & Derakshan, 2017; Thorson & Sheble, 2017).  According to Maweu (2019) “Whatever we call it, propaganda, disinformation and  misinformation is as old as mankind and has only been systematically blown to  almost uncontrollable levels by the advent of digital media” (p.63). 

Social media has emerged as one of the central areas through which voters get  information but has also been identified to be a perfect platform or breeding  ground for misinformation or disinformation and conspiracy narratives. Social  media platforms and the many online platforms have presented voters with the  challenge of encountering an enormous amount of information online, including  false information. According to Chakrabarti (2018), the effects of information  disorder are heightened especially because of the power of social media. The way  this works is that ordinary citizens can now be part of the mass media space by  sharing news immediately, journalists also tend to use the social media space as  a sourcing mechanism to dig for news. The problem that this creates is that it  hampers people’s ability to discern truth and make discerning decisions on critical  issues including on voting decisions.  

The period before, during and after elections appear to be periods usually characterised by the rise in misinformation and disinformation particularly about  candidates and policies, thus posing a major developmental challenge as a result of  its potential to affect the credibility of elections and the sanctity of the competitive  nature of elections as some parties seek to gain undue advantage. 

The 2020 elections in Ghana were unique in more than one way. It was the first  time that a one-term president (former president John Mahama of the National  Democratic Congress, NDC) was seeking to come back to office. Also, the  incumbent president Nana Akufo-Addo (of the New Patriotic Party, NPP) was  seeking re-election but it was his second time facing the opposition candidate John Dramani Mahama in an electoral contest. The historical nature of the elections  heightened the stakes thereby providing the fertile ground for a possible trend or propagation of information disorder.  

As Ghana moves to consolidate its democracy, research involving information  disorder is necessary to attempt to address the ways in which the public sphere is  polluted particularly during elections. There is no doubt that if this is not addressed  it has the potential to mar the democratic record of Ghana. Though the notion of  information disorder is not new as observed by Maweu (2019), it’s current upsurge  and lack of systematic research in this area makes this study significant. This  report comprehensively analyses information disorder in Ghana before, during and  after the 2020 elections.

Download Research Paper

Show More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button